Key result
Echocardiographic linear fractional shortening in the RV outflow tract showed good diagnostic performance for CMR-defined right ventricular dysfunction (AUC 0.89; 95% CI 0.82-0.97; P<.001).
Why the study?
Does echocardiography-based linear fractional shortening accurately quantify right ventricular systolic function compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with left ventricular dysfunction?
Observational (n=168)
Does echocardiography-based linear fractional shortening accurately quantify right ventricular systolic function compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with left ventricular dysfunction?
Echocardiographic linear fractional shortening indices of the right ventricle correlate well with CMR RVEF and provide good diagnostic performance for detecting RV dysfunction.
RV linear FS on echo may complement standard RV indices in LVdys; leaves open incremental value over FAC before prospective outcome validation.
Background Echocardiography (echo)‐based linear fractional shortening (FS) is widely used to assess left ventricular dysfunction (LVdys), but has not been systematically tested for right ventricular dysfunction (RVdys). Methods The population comprised LVdys patients with and without RVdys (EF<50%) on cardiac MRI (CMR): Echo included standard RV indices (fractional area change [FAC], TAPSE, Sʹ, and FS in parasternal long‐axis (RV outflow tract [RVOT]) and apical four‐chamber views (width [RVWD], length [RVLG]). Results A total of 168 patients underwent echo and CMR (3±3 days); FAC (46±9 vs 28±11), TAPSE (1.9±0.4 vs 1.5±0.3), and Sʹ (11.4±2.3 vs 10.0±2.6, all P≤.001) were lower among RVdys patients, as were FS indices (RVOT 32±8 vs 17±10 | RVWD 40±11 vs 22±12 | RVLG 16±5 vs 9±4%; all P<.001). FS indices yielded similar magnitude of correlation with CMR RVEF (r=.73‐.56) as did FAC (r=.70), which was slightly higher than TAPSE (r=.47) and Sʹ (r=.31; all P<.001). FS indices decreased stepwise vs CMR RVEF tertiles, as did FAC (all P<.001). In multivariate analysis, FS in RVOT (regression coefficient .51 [CI 0.37‐0.65]), RVWD (0.30 [0.19‐0.41]), and RVLG (0.45 [0.20‐0.71]; all P≤.001) was independently associated with CMR RVEF. FS indices yielded good overall diagnostic performance (AUC: RVOT 0.89 [CI 0.82‐0.97] | RVWD 0.87 [0.78‐0.96] | RVLG 0.80 [0.70‐0.90]; all P<.001) for CMR‐defined RVdy (RVEF<50%). Conclusions RV linear FS provides RV functional indices that parallel CMR RVEF. Parasternal long‐axis RVOT width, four‐chamber RV width, and length are independently associated with RVEF, supporting use of multiple FS indices for RV functional assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srinivasan et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Left ventricular dysfunction with and without right ventricular dysfunction (n=168). Echocardiographic linear fractional shortening (FS) vs. Cardiac MRI (CMR) was evaluated on Diagnostic performance for CMR-defined right ventricular dysfunction (RVEF<50%) (AUC 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97, p=<.001). Echocardiographic linear fractional shortening in the RV outflow tract showed good diagnostic performance for CMR-defined right ventricular dysfunction (AUC 0.89; 95% CI 0.82-0.97; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: