Key result
High baseline D-dimer levels (>1.65 µg/ml) independently predicted the development of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction within 12 months (OR 3.93).
Why the study?
D-dimer is a sensitive biomarker for cancer-associated thrombosis, but its significance in cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction remains poorly understood.
Does elevated baseline D-dimer predict the development of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction in patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy?
Cohort (n=169)
No
Does elevated baseline D-dimer predict the development of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction in patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy?
Elevated baseline D-dimer levels (>1.65 μg/ml) independently predict the development of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiotoxic chemotherapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High D-dimer may flag CTRCD risk during chemotherapy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background D-dimer is a sensitive biomarker for cancer-associated thrombosis, but little is known about its significance on cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Methods Consecutive 169 patients planned for cardiotoxic chemotherapy were enrolled and followed up for 12 months. All patients underwent echocardiography and blood test at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12 months. Results The patients were divided into two groups based on the level of D-dimer (>1.65 μg/ml or ≦ 1.65 μg/ml) at baseline before chemotherapy: high D-dimer group ( n = 37) and low D-dimer group ( n = 132). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased at 3- and 6 months after chemotherapy in high D-dimer group [baseline, 65.2% (62.8–71.4%); 3 months, 62.9% (59.0–67.7%); 6 months, 63.1% (60.0–67.1%); 12 months, 63.3% (58.8–66.0%), p = 0.03], but no change was observed in low D-dimer group. The occurrence of CTRCD within the 12-month follow-up period was higher in the high D-dimer group than in the low D-dimer group (16.2 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.0146). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that high D-dimer level at baseline was an independent predictor of the development of CTRCD [odds ratio 3.93, 95% CI (1.00–15.82), p = 0.047]. Conclusion We should pay more attention to elevated D-dimer levels not only as a sign of cancer-associated thrombosis but also the future occurrence of CTRCD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oikawa et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Cancer patients planned for cardiotoxic chemotherapy (n=169). High D-dimer level (>1.65 µg/ml) vs. Low D-dimer level (≦1.65 µg/ml) was evaluated on Occurrence of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) within 12 months (OR 3.93, 95% CI 1.00-15.82, p=0.047). High baseline D-dimer levels (>1.65 µg/ml) independently predicted the development of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction within 12 months (OR 3.93).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: