Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual framework reveals nature connection as a relational intervention for youth wellbeing, highlighting accessible practices across clinical and community systems.
Children and adolescents are navigating unprecedented levels of stress, disconnection, and ecological anxiety, including growing distress related to climate change and the rapid decline of meaningful contact with the natural world. Drawing from Relational–Cultural Theory and Bronfenbrenner’s ecological framework, this conceptual article proposes that nature connection serves as a growth-fostering relational experience capable of catalyzing connection across multiple developmental systems. Using the Five Good Things as an organizing framework, we outline clinically grounded, accessible nature-based interventions that enhance individual vitality, clarity, worth, empowerment, and relational motivation across a range of settings, from wilderness-adjacent spaces to the therapy office, without requiring specialized outdoor programming. We then extend these practices to dyadic, group, family, school, and community contexts, illustrating how nature can initiate upward spirals of connection. This article presents a conceptual framework intended to guide clinical practice and generate empirical inquiry; it is not a systematic or integrative review of existing nature-based intervention research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: