Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review demonstrates comparative performance and cost-benefit trade-offs of lunar energy architectures, highlighting a milestone roadmap for in-situ resource-enabled deep space infrastructure.
Sustainable, high-power energy infrastructure is essential for lunar bases yet must withstand the Moon’s extreme environment. This review compares power-generation, storage, and grid technologies across performance, environmental adaptation, in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) compatibility, and technology readiness; adds a first-order economic cost–benefit analysis of integrated architectures; and proposes a staged, milestone-driven development roadmap. Together, these provide a framework for resilient, ISRU-enabled lunar energy systems supporting habitation and deep-space exploration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: