Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Methodological study reveals prioritized visitor requirements in industrial-heritage tourism, highlighting improved experience design through integrated real-user, agent, and expert data.
To address limited sample coverage, fragmented requirement expressions, and weak strategy translation in industrial-heritage tourism, this study proposes the Real–Agent–Designer Multi-Source Requirements Mining methodology (RAD-MRM). It integrates 26 real-user semi-structured interviews, 26 Agent-user virtual interviews, input from three experience designers, 188 valid Kano questionnaires, and a 10-member evaluation panel. Kano analysis reduced 18 candidate requirements to 13 retained requirements. AHP identified intelligent route-flow management, experience retention, deep narrative, and real-time state sensing as high-priority requirements. FCE combined with entropy weighting showed that six experience-design strategies achieved an overall “Good” evaluation, with a comprehensive score of 3.264 and non-zero weights for all strategies. RAD-MRM therefore provides a structured pathway from multi-source requirement elicitation and screening to priority determination and strategy evaluation in complex cultural-tourism research and practice. Agent-user virtual interviews functioned only as a supplementary source of requirement expression and were not treated as substitutes for evidence from real users.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: