Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals wide payback ranges and vehicle-to-grid substitution effects in solar battery systems, highlighting the necessity of integrated revenue-stacking models.
Battery energy storage systems (BESSs) are increasingly coupled with photovoltaic (PV) generation, yet their deployment is governed by economics rather than by technical feasibility. This review synthesises 122 indexed Q1/Q2 studies (2016–2026) on the financial payback and return on investment of PV-coupled storage, extending the analysis to vehicle-to-grid (V2G) integration. Records retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and the MDPI portal were screened to peer-reviewed journals, assigned to ten thematic clusters, appraised against a ten-criterion reporting-transparency rubric, and combined by narrative synthesis. Reported payback periods range from a few years to beyond the asset’s service life, and the levelized cost of storage spans roughly 170–350 USD/MWh. In the reviewed corpus, the retail-to-export price spread, the stacking of self-consumption, arbitrage, grid-service revenues, and degradation-aware operation each move returns in a consistent direction, whereas which of them binds hardest is a property of the case rather than a ranking the evidence supports. V2G is almost always analysed in isolation from stationary storage; an illustrative harmonised comparison indicates that it substitutes for stationary capacity rather than adding to it. The review maps the combined PV+BESS+V2G revenue stack and identifies an integrated, degradation-corrected, policy-sensitive economic model as the principal research gap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bobček et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: