Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational evaluation demonstrates superior alignment and privacy preservation in petrochemical datasets, indicating effective automated data construction.
To mitigate high expert-annotation costs, domain-preference misalignment, and the inherent trade-off between sensitive-data protection and training utility in petrochemical dataset construction, an iterative framework combining human-feedback-aligned reinforcement learning (RLHF) with post hoc data de-identification is proposed. Direct scoring and pairwise preference feedback are generated using two high-capability language models. A reward model is subsequently trained via a joint Bradley–Terry and mean-squared-error loss, followed by three rounds of closed-loop proximal policy optimization (PPO) constrained by a fixed supervised fine-tuning reference model. Retained high-quality samples are then processed through a four-stage post-RLHF de-identification pipeline. Experimental results demonstrate that the PPO-V3 model achieves a reward score increase of 1.183 over the baseline alongside a 96.2% pairwise win rate, while the sensitivity-aware adaptive differential privacy with context-aware token-level injection (SA-ADP-CTI) post-RLHF de-identification method attains a composite score of 0.9636. The reliability of both the automated feedback and privacy-preservation mechanisms is further validated through blind expert review and manual spot checks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: