Prospective study demonstrates increased incomplete blinks and meibomian gland loss after ptosis surgery, highlighting potential long-term ocular surface risks.
Purpose: To prospectively evaluate changes in blink dynamics following unilateral ptosis surgery and to assess their relationship with ocular surface parameters. Methods: Sixteen patients (10 female, 6 male; mean age 56.0 ± 13.2 years) undergoing unilateral levator aponeurosis advancement were enrolled. Incomplete blink percentage and blink rate were assessed using slow-motion smartphone videography. Noninvasive tear break-up time, meibomian gland area loss, palpebral fissure height, and margin reflex distance 1 were measured bilaterally at baseline and at a postoperative visit between day 45 and 60. Ocular surface symptoms were assessed with the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Results: Incomplete blink percentage increased markedly in the operated eye following surgery (12.0% [0.0–50.8] vs. 67.5% [49.0–90.0], p = 0.001), with patients demonstrating ≥50% incomplete blink rates rising from 37.5% to 75.0%. Meibomian gland area loss also increased significantly (29.2% [17.9–42.1] vs. 36.9% [24.9–47.0], p = 0.016). Blink rate, noninvasive tear break-up time, and Ocular Surface Disease Index did not change significantly. No eye-specific parameter changed in the contralateral eye. A negative correlation was found between preoperative incomplete blink percentage and magnitude of postoperative change (r = −0.606, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Levator aponeurosis advancement produces a marked and selective increase in incomplete blink percentage accompanied by increased meibomian gland area loss, without affecting blink rate or the contralateral eye. Blink incompleteness may represent a clinically underrecognized consequence of ptosis surgery with long-term ocular surface implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ağaçkesen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: