Literature review finds an absence of mathematical or experimental evidence for tubulin quantum coherence, indicating that prominent quantum consciousness theories remain unsubstantiated.
FINDING: Search results are mostly popular/video links with no substantive mathematical content; the only peer-reviewed item (arXiv:1401.3218) concerns quantum beats in cavity QED, not tubulin or consciousness. No frequency ratio 2:3 or 10^-13 s coherence time is confirmed in any source. | MATH: No equations, constants, or ratios extractable from the provided material. The arXiv abstract mentions "second-order correlations" and "two-mode cavity QED" but gives no explicit Hamiltonian, no numerical frequencies, no coherence times. | CONNECTION: None found. The 0.1 Hz and 5.5 breaths/min references are physiological pacing, not geometric harmony. No 0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618, base-60, or crystallographic symmetry appears in any cited text. | DEPTH: 1 — The search query's premise (tubulin lattice 2:3 ratio, 10^-13 s coherence) is unsupported by the returned evidence. The only rigorous item is unrelated to consciousness or microtubules. This is a null result: no mathematical essence Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Stewart Caldin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: