Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study observes no reduction in 28-day mortality with anakinra or tocilizumab in severe COVID-19, highlighting uncertainty regarding cytokine blockade in critical illness.
Background Interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 blockade have been widely used in severe COVID-19, but comparative real-world evidence regarding anakinra and tocilizumab in critically ill patients remains limited. We evaluated the associations of first initiation of anakinra or tocilizumab with 28-day and overall in-hospital mortality. Methods This single-center retrospective ICU cohort included adults with severe COVID-19. During hospital days 2–10, daily actions were classified as anakinra initiation, tocilizumab initiation, or control/defer. Calibrated overlap-weighted modified-Poisson models estimated associations with 28-day and overall in-hospital mortality; ferritin-adjusted sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Of 306 patients, 241 patients contributed 1,297 eligible person-days. Calibration met the prespecified balance criterion for the included covariates, although effective support for tocilizumab initiation remained limited. For 28-day in-hospital mortality, adjusted RRs versus control/defer were 0.99 (95% CI, 0.80–1.22) for anakinra and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.71–1.37) for tocilizumab. No clear associations were identified in the head-to-head comparison or for overall in-hospital mortality; ferritin-adjusted estimates were similar. Conclusions In this retrospective ICU cohort, neither anakinra nor tocilizumab initiation showed a clear association with 28-day or overall in-hospital mortality. Estimates were imprecise, particularly for tocilizumab, and remain susceptible to residual confounding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AVŞAR et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: