Key result
Respiratory phase shows no effect on cortical readiness potential amplitude during natural breathing.
Why the study?
Recent studies reported coupling between respiratory phase and the cortical readiness potential, but whether breathing truly modulates neural processes preceding voluntary action remained unclear.
Observational
The study refutes previous claims that respiratory phase modulates the cortical readiness potential, demonstrating that the apparent coupling was due to a methodological confound.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“We show that voluntary action is indeed linked to your body's inner state, especially with breathing and expiration but not with some other bodily signals, such as the heartbeat.”
No respiratory modulation of readiness potential under natural breathing; challenges prior coupling reports as artifacts and leaves open paced-breathing effects.
Respiratory processes are increasingly implicated in shaping neural activity and behavior. Recent studies have reported a coupling between respiratory phase and the cortical readiness potential (RP), suggesting that breathing may modulate the neural processes preceding voluntary action. Here, using electroencephalography recordings in humans, we re-examine this claim using the original dataset and a new independent dataset, as well as in simulated data with no coupling. We show that the reported association arises from a confound: both RP amplitude and respiratory phase are coupled to movement onset. The original analysis does not control for this dependency, leading to a spurious effect that is also observed in simulated data. When trials are instead grouped by respiratory phase at the time of movement, thereby controlling for this confound, the apparent coupling disappears. Across datasets, Bayesian analyses provide evidence for the absence of an effect under natural breathing conditions. These findings indicate that respiratory phase does not directly modulate RP amplitude during spontaneous behavior. More broadly, they reveal a shortcoming of phase-amplitude coupling analyses applied to epoched data with slowly varying signals, and highlight the importance of controlling for shared dependencies when interpreting physiological–neural relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeay-Bizot et al. (2026) reported an observational. Respiratory phase was evaluated on Cortical readiness potential (RP) amplitude. Respiratory phase does not directly modulate readiness potential amplitude during spontaneous behavior, as Bayesian analyses provide evidence for the absence of an effect under natural breathing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: