Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis reveals non-log-concave antichain polynomials in connected Peck posets, disproving the Ding–Dong conjecture with an infinite counterexample family.
Ding and Dong conjectured that the antichain generating polynomial of every finite connected Peck poset is log-concave. For integers a,c>=1, we construct a connected height-one Peck poset P(a,c) with two equally sized ranks and derive the closed formula N(P(a,c);x)=(1+2x)^a+2(1+x)^(a+c)-2(1+x)^a. For every a>=7, the specialization P(a,2) is not log-concave, giving an infinite counterexample family to Conjecture C. The first member on this parameter line has 18 elements and log-concavity defect -72. Status: Public Beta; internally verified candidate proof; external mathematical review pending.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carptopus (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: