PURPOSE: To evaluate incidence, features, risk factors, and prognosis of iridocyclitis after angle-supported phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Private practice, Siena, Italy. METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised 356 consecutive eyes of 212 patients. In myopic eyes, the ZSAL-4 IOL (205 eyes of 125 patients) or the ZSAL-4 Plus IOL (106 eyes of 63 patients) was used. In hyperopic eyes (45 eyes of 24 patients), the Type 54 IOL was implanted. Haptic posterior angulation was 19 degrees (ZSAL-4), 23 degrees (ZSAL-4 Plus), and 14 degrees (Type 54). RESULTS: Clinically significant iridocyclitis occurred in 11 eyes (3.1%) of 11 patients. Mean patient age was 37.3 years +/- 9.4 (SD). Sixty-four percent were male (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 7.4, not statistically significant). Iridocyclitis was observed in 4.4% of hyperopic eyes (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.3 to 7.4; not statistically significant) and in 2.9% of myopic eyes. In myopic eyes, it followed the implantation of ZSAL-4 IOL in 3.9% of eyes (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 0.5 to 33.6; not statistically significant), and of ZSAL-4 Plus IOL in 1%. Mean time from surgery was 8.5 +/- 10.6 months). Presentation included aqueous flare (100%), posterior synechiae (82%), blurred vision (82%), redness (36%), pain (27%), IOL precipitates (18%), and angular synechiae (9%). Only 1 patient had recurrences, leading to IOL explantation and cataract surgery. After topical therapy, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was fully recovered in 9 of 11 eyes. CONCLUSION: Iridocyclitis can occur months or years after the implantation of angle-supported phakic IOLs. No statistically significant risk factors were identified. Functional prognosis is generally good.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonio Leccisotti (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: