This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
To address the trade-off between flame retardancy and mechanical strength of acrylonitrile butadiene-styrene (ABS), the Sb 2 MoO 6 -modified graphitic carbon nitride (CN-AM) nanoflakes with different mass ratios of Sb 2 MoO 6 (AM) to graphitic carbon nitride ( g -C 3 N 4 ) were successfully prepared in this work. When the mass ratio of g -C 3 N 4 to AM is 100:10, the resultant CN-AM1 nanosheets can be evenly distributed within ABS at different addition amounts. Due to the physical barrier effect of the well-dispersed CN-AM1, the ABS/(CN-AM1) composites show well-maintained initial decomposition temperatures (368-375°C) and increased char residues (up to 2.72 wt% at 700°C) relative to pure ABS. The addition of CN-AM1 also brings about the enhanced tensile strength due to its rigid nanosheet structure, and the tensile strength of ABS/(CN-AM1)15 with 15 wt% of CN-AM1 reaches 76.4 MPa, which is increased by 18.8% compared with ABS. During combustion, the degradation products of CN-AM1 can function in the condensed phase to suppress the heat release and smoke generation, as confirmed by 62.5% and 49.7% reductions in peak heat release rate (PHRR) and peak smoke production rate (PSPR) of ABS/(CN-AM1)15 relative to ABS. The limiting oxygen index (LOI) and vertical combustion (UL-94) classification of ABS/(CN-AM1)15 are up to 28.9% and V-0, demonstrating satisfactory flame retardancy. Thus, this work delivers an effective design strategy for enhancing flame retardancy, thermal stability and mechanical strength of ABS by well-designed nanoflakes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: