Purpose: This study aimed to assess the DIP reformation effects among cancer inpatients. Materials and methods: A total of 13085 observations from a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou city were evaluated by mortality, 30-day readmission rate, length of stay (LOS), disease severity, total expenditures (TE), and out-of-pocket (OOP) and OOP ratio. We used interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) to evaluate the effect for control for the confounding factors. Results: A slightly increasing trend of 30-day readmission rate, LOS, comorbidity, and OOP were showed at the time of intervention. TE showed an apparent increase at the time of intervention (9159.580, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6543.959~11775.200, P < 0.001). OOP ratio showed an apparent decrease at the time of intervention (-0.0889, 95% CI: -0.1119~-0.0659, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study shows that DIP has been effective in alleviating the personal economic burden of health and maintaining the quality of healthcare services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: