Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of supplementation with a combination of antioxidant vitamins and trace elements, at nutritional doses, upon the 6.5-year risk of hypertension in the SU.VI.MAX trial. To describe the association between baseline plasma antioxidant levels and the same long-term risk using observational data from the study. SETTING: A total of 5086 adults from the SU.VI.MAX trial, a randomized primary prevention trial. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo group, no effect of supplementation upon the 6.5-year risk of hypertension could be detected (odds ratio, 1.04 and 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.23 in men; and odds ratio, 1.10 and 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.29 in women). Furthermore, compared with men in the first tertile, those in the second and third tertiles of serum baseline levels of beta-carotene presented a lower risk of hypertension in both the placebo and supplementation groups. Multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.70 (0.44-1.12) and 0.53 (0.33-0.86) in the placebo group, and were 0.59 (0.37-0.94) and 0.67 (0.42-1.07) in the supplementation group. In women, a decreasing trend was observed with vitamin C levels and risk of hypertension in the intervention group. No association could be shown between vitamin E and trace element plasma levels and the risk of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an inverse association between baseline plasma levels of beta-carotene in men and the risk of developing hypertension, we could not demonstrate any beneficial effect of low-dose antioxidant supplementation upon the 6.5-year risk of hypertension in the randomized analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Czernichow et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: