Key result
Digitalis and quinidine retain their positions of preeminence as antiarrhythmic drugs for the management of cardiac arrhythmias.
This review highlights the continued preeminence of digitalis and quinidine in the management of cardiac arrhythmias.
Affirms digitalis and quinidine for arrhythmia management; leaves open comparative efficacy versus modern agents in prospective trials.
THERE has been a resurgence of interest in cardiac arrhythmias in the past few years. Many excellent papers have been published reporting clinical and experimental investigations of the nature and treatment of these disturbances. From this wealth of data and detail one fact emerges with startling clarity, namely, that digitalis and quinidine still retain their positions of preeminence as antiarrhythmic drugs. The work and experience of recent years have resulted in a better understanding of the action and methods of employment of these two drugs and, in addition, have brought into prominence various agents of lesser importance but of occasional great value. It is the purpose of this paper to review briefly the current status of the management of cardiac arrhythmias. A simplified list of recommended drugs and dosages is appended in the Table. It is obvious that not all arrhythmias need to be treated. Sinus arrhythmia, sinus bradycardia, A-V nodal rhythms (including interference dissociation), and
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charles D. Enselberg (1955) conducted a review in cardiac arrhythmias. digitalis and quinidine was evaluated. Digitalis and quinidine retain their positions of preeminence as antiarrhythmic drugs for the management of cardiac arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: