Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced macrophage activation is a prototype of innate immune response. Although key effector proteins in LPS signaling pathway have been revealed, the map of dynamic protein interactions and phosphorylation as well as the stoichiometry of protein complexes are lacking. Here we present a dynamic map of protein interactions and phosphorylation in MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO complexes obtained by SWATH-MS. The comprehensive MS measurement leads to quantification of up to about 3,000 proteins across about 21–40 IP samples. We detected and quantified almost all known interactors of MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO. By analyzing these quantitative data, we uncovered differential recruitment of IRAK family proteins to LPS-induced signaling complexes and determined the stoichiometry of the Myddosome complex. In addition, quantitative phosphoproteomics analysis identified a number of unreported high-confidence phosphosites on the key proteins in LPS signaling pathway. Collectively, data of dynamic protein interactions and phosphorylation presented by this study could be a resource for further study of the LPS signaling pathway. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced macrophage activation is a prototype of innate immune response. Although key effector proteins in LPS signaling pathway have been revealed, the map of dynamic protein interactions and phosphorylation as well as the stoichiometry of protein complexes are lacking. Here we present a dynamic map of protein interactions and phosphorylation in MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO complexes obtained by SWATH-MS. The comprehensive MS measurement leads to quantification of up to about 3,000 proteins across about 21–40 IP samples. We detected and quantified almost all known interactors of MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO. By analyzing these quantitative data, we uncovered differential recruitment of IRAK family proteins to LPS-induced signaling complexes and determined the stoichiometry of the Myddosome complex. In addition, quantitative phosphoproteomics analysis identified a number of unreported high-confidence phosphosites on the key proteins in LPS signaling pathway. Collectively, data of dynamic protein interactions and phosphorylation presented by this study could be a resource for further study of the LPS signaling pathway. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) 1The abbreviations used are: LPSlipopolysaccharidesTLR4Toll-like receptor 4. 1The abbreviations used are: LPSlipopolysaccharidesTLR4Toll-like receptor 4. are major components of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Ligation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) with LPS ultimately leads to activation of multiple signaling pathways, such as MAPK, NF-κB, and IRFs pathways (1Lu Y.C. Yeh W.C. Ohashi P.S. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway.Cytokine. 2008; 42: 145-151Crossref PubMed Scopus (2021) Google Scholar). The activated signaling pathways regulate expression of a variety of cytokines, chemokines, and type I IFNs, which are essential in inflammation and host defense against microbial infection. MyD88 and TRIF are proximal signaling effectors of TLR4 that elicit MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent (TRIF-dependent) pathways (2Lord K.A. Hoffman-Liebermann B. Liebermann D.A. Nucleotide sequence and expression of a cDNA encoding MyD88, a novel myeloid differentiation primary response gene induced by IL6.Oncogene. 1990; 5: 1095-1097PubMed Google Scholar, 3Yamamoto M. Sato S. Hemmi H. Hoshino K. Kaisho T. Sanjo H. Takeuchi O. Sugiyama M. Okabe M. Takeda K. Akira S. Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway.Science. 2003; 301: 640-643Crossref PubMed Scopus (2497) Google Scholar). The activation of the MyD88-dependent pathway leads to the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, whereas the MyD88-independent pathway mediates the induction of Type I interferons and interferon-inducible genes. lipopolysaccharides Toll-like receptor 4. lipopolysaccharides Toll-like receptor 4. On LPS stimulation, TIRAP is first recruited to TLR4 and MyD88 is then recruited to TIRAP, highlighting the importance of TIRAP in MyD88 recruitment to TLR4 (4Horng T. Barton G.M. Medzhitov R. TIRAP: an adapter molecule in the Toll signaling pathway.Nat. Immunol. 2001; 2: 835-841Crossref PubMed Scopus (826) Google Scholar, 5Fitzgerald K.A. Palsson-McDermott E.M. Bowie A.G. Jefferies C.A. Mansell A.S. Brady G. Brint E. Dunne A. Gray P. Harte M.T. McMurray D. Smith D.E. Sims J.E. Bird T.A. O'Neill L.A. Mal (MyD88-adapter-like) is required for Toll-like receptor-4 signal transduction.Nature. 2001; 413: 78-83Crossref PubMed Scopus (996) Google Scholar). The IRAK family proteins, including IRAK1–4, are then recruited to MyD88. Downstream of IRAK1 and IRAK4, TRAF6 is critical to the MyD88-dependent pathway (6Lomaga M.A. Yeh W.C. Sarosi I. Duncan G.S. Furlonger C. Ho A. Morony S. Capparelli C. Van G. Kaufman S. van der Heiden A. Itie A. Wakeham A. Khoo W. Sasaki T. Cao Z. Penninger J.M. Paige C.J. Lacey D.L. Dunstan C.R. Boyle W.J. Goeddel D.V. Mak T.W. TRAF6 deficiency results in osteopetrosis and defective interleukin-1, CD40, and LPS signaling.Genes Dev. 1999; 13: 1015-1024Crossref PubMed Scopus (1077) Google Scholar). TRAF6 forms a complex with UBC13 and UEV1A, which activates TAK1 (7Deng L. Wang C. Spencer E. Yang L. Braun A. You J. Slaughter C. Pickart C. Chen Z.J. Activation of the IkappaB kinase complex by TRAF6 requires a dimeric ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme complex and a unique polyubiquitin chain.Cell. 2000; 103: 351-361Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1505) Google Scholar). Subsequently TAK1 activates downstream NF-κB and MAPK pathways. The MyD88-indepent signaling pathway is mediated by TRIF, an important TIR-containing adaptor protein. TRIF recruits TRAF3 which then associates with TANK (TRAF family member-associated NF-κB activator), TBK1 and IKKi to mediate IRF3 dimerization (8Hacker H. Redecke V. Blagoev B. Kratchmarova I. Hsu L.C. Wang G.G. Kamps M.P. Raz E. Wagner H. Hacker G. Mann M. Karin M. Specificity in Toll-like receptor signalling through distinct effector functions of TRAF3 and TRAF6.Nature. 2006; 439: 204-207Crossref PubMed Scopus (738) Google Scholar, 9Oganesyan G. Saha S.K. Guo B. He J.Q. Shahangian A. Zarnegar B. Perry A. Cheng G. Critical role of TRAF3 in the Toll-like receptor-dependent and -independent antiviral response.Nature. 2006; 439: 208-211Crossref PubMed Scopus (705) Google Scholar, 10Fitzgerald K.A. McWhirter S.M. Faia K.L. Rowe D.C. Latz E. Golenbock D.T. Coyle A.J. Liao S.M. Maniatis T. IKKepsilon and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway.Nat. Immunol. 2003; 4: 491-496Crossref PubMed Scopus (2068) Google Scholar). IRF3, cooperating with NF-κB, activates the transcription of target genes, such as Type I interferons and interferon-inducible genes (11Moynagh P.N. TLR signalling and activation of IRFs: revisiting old friends from the NF-kappaB pathway.Trends Immunol. 2005; 26: 469-476Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (257) Google Scholar). Although TLR4 signaling pathway has been intensively studied in the past few years, several important questions still remain unsolved. Although LPS-induced NF-κB activation is abolished in TAK1-deficient MEF cells, it is not affected in TAK1-deficient macrophages (12Sato S. Sanjo H. Takeda K. Ninomiya-Tsuji J. Yamamoto M. Kawai T. Matsumoto K. Takeuchi O. Akira S. Essential function for the kinase TAK1 in innate and adaptive immune responses.Nat. Immunol. 2005; 6: 1087-1095Crossref PubMed Scopus (752) Google Scholar, 13Ajibade A.A. Wang Q. Cui J. Zou J. Xia X. Wang M. Tong Y. Hui W. Liu D. Su B. Wang H.Y. Wang R.F. TAK1 negatively regulates NF-kappaB and p38 MAP kinase activation in Gr-1+CD11b+ neutrophils.Immunity. 2012; 36: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). that downstream of not are essential for LPS-induced NF-κB activation in is complex is and the stoichiometry of this complex of all is a MS which the of MS and L.C. P. S. H. L. R. R. data of the by a for and 2012; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, C. L. G. S. R. for quantitative a PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). and protein quantification across multiple samples. protein quantification for of protein complex stoichiometry M. I. G. R. M. A. van A. M. R. by PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In this we used to protein complexes from macrophage on a of LPS and quantified proteins and phosphorylation in these complexes SWATH-MS. all known in LPS pathway have been identified and quantified in key protein and phosphorylation in MyD88, and NEMO complexes LPS are the complex in LPS signaling pathway. In addition, we the stoichiometry of which an TIRAP and MyD88 to signal transduction and IRAK complex are TRAF6 and MyD88 with LPS for with LPS for with LPS for complexes with for TRAF6 cells, and for MyD88 and for is the of the from to MS analysis the for in the In the differential expression proteins with and as The by the and The by of of the of the target and downstream of the of the target the in to proximal to the in the of target genes. The target used for and for The the gene and gene the with the and then for then for by and the with to the gene The by and NEMO The target sequence used The the gene and gene the The by and by and NEMO with The by The the in in with the with LPS for TRAF6 cells, we for in which in IP samples. with LPS for in with LPS in which in IP samples. IP of in and with and on for The then for 4 The for with 4 protein complexes with complexes with of with in and then with The protein with and in proteins in in and and for for and to with and the of The by the to a of by with and with in and with of The with for with for by then with and in on a in of all The by with a of with about used to the a from to in in in H. B. S.K. S. D. G. M. S. B. of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). which in by that in to and the is about The are: The are: for in the a to the of a from the of MS and of for and the In and and and In a by in to B. R. D. D.L. S. L. B. B. J. K. D. B. T.A. C. D. L. K. C. B. J. P. S. T. A. J. B. T. K. J. J.E. M. D.L. P. for and 2012; PubMed Scopus Google and the a number of and to the the MyD88 data TRAF6 data NEMO data of and of and in multiple first the first in and then across all The in and and the of and then The in and The to which with L. D. T. H. Z. E. B. B. R. of the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). to T.A. an sequence 13: PubMed Scopus Google and and R. proteins with PubMed Scopus Google against the as by in with and sequence The as and The results and A. E. R. to the of by and PubMed Scopus Google with and by D. H. Z. L. R. analysis of data and protein and Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google with L. M. M. A. J.M. R. for data by Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google used to to The the H. R. for in 2008; 5: PubMed Scopus Google for with The of in with from and used for The with the of by with of and first by for of as to and to in with and and The as and The with and by with The by for phosphosites The first the to which determined by and then these the for by with The of in with from and used for The with the we used and to the we we with and and the as the first to in by with and and The with by determined by in which to proteins The to protein and to with The of in with used for and proteins the with the The to which then to with which is T. S. C. H. S. P. E. X. S. L. J. G. M. J. M. D. O. L. R. K. O. a for data 13: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). detected of the proteins by for for of for L. O. P. R. M. R. data and for PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, G. I. M. Liu Y. L. S. R. of and protein in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). protein is in all The results Liu Y. G. M. P. G. L. G. L. R. an for protein quantification in 13: PubMed Scopus Google for The in as The results used for protein and proteins with as and the for about of all identified the to protein as The with the proteins with for protein and The of unique protein as protein the gene and as the first of the protein M. L. J.M. R. of protein 2012; Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus Google Scholar). quantitative of IP data identified in all of for of quantitative from by the In data all identified from the protein by the in all of the protein and of these the protein in the We that of protein detected the comprehensive not by as in MS all by as protein in the of TIRAP detected the in TRAF6 data not the that the present in the not in the the in as and for downstream of we used to this The as detected in not in the of the in used for of the in B. The in in which as in B. in then the in B. this not of the in The of the in by the of In the of the in the and detected across the The and the in the the of we of with the of in a We the of to of about and we the number The with and as The from and and to The of as of and The protein S. T. P. A. T. Mann M. J. The for comprehensive analysis of 13: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The and differential expression analysis with The of of proteins and several used to identified by the we the we the proteins quantitative in LPS the with of the by and then The with for and then with primary 4 by with for The of an for from for and from for from with the NF-κB and the expression the in the with the to from to the cDNA with and in a by with the results by quantification by to the are on has been to dynamic protein interactions in signaling pathways E. R. T. M. S. A. I. T. M. T. M. R. S. H. R. B. M. of signaling complexes in primary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, L.C. G. A. M. R. protein by to the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, G. B. M. Q. S. M. R. T. R. S. differential by with PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). from MS data for of data in an from data be The the novel not detected by P. J. L.C. B. L. G. Y. R. S. study for PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is of that could be the from of data be by the comprehensive and the from TRAF6 is an effector essential for LPS signal we used measurement of dynamic interactions TRAF6 and proteins in macrophages as an to the the role of TRAF6 in LPS signaling we first in macrophage of TRAF6 LPS as by activation of MAP and and NF-κB TRAF6 we TRAF6 of the LPS and TRAF6 and we used to proteins in from the TRAF6 The with LPS for in and TRAF6 complexes then by and to analysis We have a which to proteins by protein and of Y. X. S. X. Y. Chen J. J. S. J. analyzing multiple data PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). analysis Y. X. S. X. Y. Chen J. J. S. J. analyzing multiple data PubMed Scopus Google used to from TRAF6 data The the A.A. Wang Q. Cui J. Zou J. Xia X. Wang M. Tong Y. Hui W. Liu D. Su B. Wang H.Y. Wang R.F. TAK1 negatively regulates NF-kappaB and p38 MAP kinase activation in Gr-1+CD11b+ neutrophils.Immunity. 2012; 36: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google for of protein detected with whereas identified with the identified detected by and detected and the that not in the TIRAP and which are known to a role in LPS signaling identified by the not by TRAF6 data, we these and detected about the of and proteins with detected by the protein and the unique to proteins we an of TRAF6 data, we and of the identified proteins to be in LPS-induced activation (1Lu Y.C. Yeh W.C. Ohashi P.S. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway.Cytokine. 2008; 42: 145-151Crossref PubMed Scopus (2021) Google Scholar). of have not been to be with these proteins, proteins identified with of comprehensive and in protein In to analyzing the TRAF6 we MyD88 and NEMO complexes as in MyD88 and to in response to LPS and and used in In and proteins quantified across and IP in MyD88, and NEMO data protein of the proteins identified by the be in data from T. D.A. and a novel which is in activated macrophages to of 2005; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google the from be for analysis of data from the of we protein across in data about for TRAF6 data for MyD88 data and about for NEMO data and further quantitative in we the of all LPS in data of protein and In TRAF6 data the as the first and the the this of the the dynamic of the MyD88, and NEMO we to the of the quantification and which is the in the of protein E. L. T. A. Critical of 13: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. P. D. D. W. of in and of and of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). We the protein for the proteins from to The protein in TRAF6 data about of in and The dynamic of protein the of an of proteins, we of MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO interactions across of LPS and of detected proteins in TRAF6 not in across of LPS that these proteins to TRAF6 proteins in TRAF6 data dynamic and the proteins recruited to TRAF6 complex LPS TIRAP, IRAK4, and MyD88 in this the proteins LPS and identified from MyD88 and NEMO data and further the interactors of the proteins, we a differential expression analysis and on of and all we and proteins from and quantified proteins in MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO data as the dynamic interactors of further these proteins in the of LPS we the of all of the proteins and and and protein in MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO IP complexes results with quantitative data and these proteins, detected in the protein complexes LPS for a such as the of these proteins with induction of we the expression of of the proteins and by LPS that of these proteins in the protein complexes of LPS could be from the of these protein recruitment to a protein of of we a and in this The data of of LPS in of determined by differential expression analysis and from the interactors of the protein we obtained and high-confidence MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO of these proteins to be in LPS signaling we identified an which recruited to MyD88 in an to be in antiviral signaling pathway P. He L. Cui J. C. Cao X. M. Q. Y. C. X. Wang H.Y. Wang R.F. of the Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google the role of in LPS signaling pathway of high-confidence interactors in the In MyD88 and TRAF6 the protein The of in MyD88 complex with that in TRAF6 complex the of that of in MyD88 complex whereas about of in TRAF6 complex. The of that it have distinct functions in these In addition, IRAK family proteins distinct recruitment in In MyD88 IRAK1 and the and whereas and almost that IRAK1 first recruited to MyD88, and and recruited to MyD88 by that required for LPS-induced MAPK and NF-κB activation and S. Duncan G.S. T. C. H. Wakeham A. Itie A. S. Penninger J.M. H. Ohashi P.S. Mak T.W. Yeh W.C. of and Toll-like receptor signalling in PubMed Scopus Google whereas IRAK1 and deficiency of IRAK1 and LPS signaling T. Sato S. K. H. K. Y. T. Kawai T. Takeuchi O. Akira S. of Toll-like receptor-dependent by IRAK1 and Immunol. 2008; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). dynamic analysis that the of IRAK1 and to function could be The interactions of TRAF6 with and the of LPS IRAK1 from MyD88 and in in TRAF6 complex that IRAK1 recruited to MyD88 LPS and to TRAF6 that the of TRAF6 from the receptor and the downstream signaling H. W.J. W. S. Cao Z. an adapter that recruits IRAK to the receptor Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Z. J. Takeuchi M. T. Goeddel D.V. TRAF6 is a signal for PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Y. M. Ninomiya-Tsuji J. Matsumoto K. X. of TRAF6 and in the activation of 2001; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). from to in NEMO complex. the it from MyD88 and TRAF6 from that recruited to MyD88 from it and then to NEMO has not been and of the requires quantification of proteins across be used to stoichiometry in M. I. G. R. M. A. van A. M. R. by PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). be that quantification in this which not as as We first determined the stoichiometry of TIRAP and MyD88 in TRAF6 data MyD88 and TIRAP which with of TLR MyD88 to with the of and the of MyD88 to TLR4 requires TIRAP T. Barton G.M. Medzhitov R. The adaptor molecule TIRAP signalling for Toll-like PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M. Sato S. Hemmi H. Sanjo H. S. Kaisho T. Hoshino K. Takeuchi O. M. T. Takeda K. Akira S. Essential role for TIRAP in activation of the signalling by and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). TRAF6 recruited to MyD88 complex of LPS and we the stoichiometry in TRAF6 data LPS in the stoichiometry of TIRAP: MyD88 about data that TIRAP to multiple MyD88 recruitment to TIRAP, which leads to signal we to the stoichiometry of IRAK family in TRAF6 data about The stoichiometry of and complexes in MyD88 data about that of the proteins in the of LPS In the stoichiometry of complex and about In TRAF6 the stoichiometry about in MyD88 complex that MyD88 of IRAK proteins and TRAF6 functions IRAK protein complex have in TRAF6 complex. the stoichiometry of be study a of on the of of and Y.C. H. in the complex in PubMed Scopus Google data that it is in MyD88 complex. with recruitment to and from MyD88 protein. on these we a signal in LPS pathway Although quantification has been to be about E. L. T. A. Critical of 13: PubMed Scopus Google are not affected by the of the signal in complex. of in TRAF6 and MyD88 complex be which signal in this complex. In to of key components in MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO we identified and quantified the phosphorylation in these in IP by MS and analysis The identified by these and of and distinct identified in MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO these and be quantified across the of LPS in MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO We then on quantified of high-confidence we and and We identified phosphosites in these high-confidence interactors and of have not been We first the with the stoichiometry of the phosphorylation phosphorylation of with protein and on and on and on quantified across LPS in MyD88 data on TAK1 and on a with proteins, the phosphorylation to protein on TAK1 distinct with the protein in an quantified phosphosites on phosphosites a with protein. and phosphorylation in from that of the phosphorylation on these recruitment to MyD88 In TRAF6 phosphorylation of on TRAF6 whereas phosphorylation and phosphorylation on IRAK1 in TRAF6 complex and whereas IRAK1 protein in complex from and the from IRAK1 protein and and phosphorylation of IRAK1 the on IRAK1 in TRAF6 complex not that IRAK1 first recruited to MyD88 and then to and phosphorylation on IRAK1 in MyD88 complex by to TRAF6 In NEMO phosphorylation of not in an and on on and and on as in an on to be by which the function of to pro-inflammatory J.E. J.M. A. L.C. IkappaB kinase the to of the NF-kappaB PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). and TAK1 in NF-κB we to the identified phosphosites on affected the to NF-κB this we and phosphorylation and determined to NF-κB of phosphorylation not these protein function to NF-κB we that of not to NEMO induced NF-κB gene expression that phosphorylation on NEMO a role in NF-κB have an of LPS-induced signaling we the data of of signaling and the phosphoproteomics data a LPS signaling pathway and in all known key in LPS signaling pathway are in the identified proteins We identified several high-confidence LPS-induced phosphorylation in which about not in in study as a resource for of LPS signaling pathway. In this we protein interactions and phosphorylation in LPS signaling pathway SWATH-MS. is on the that is used to and The are by data In this we used a comprehensive proteins to the IP with this not all in data from IP analysis an from to the of key proteins that are in LPS signaling pathway. that of IP a of the and the this is required for the of data from complex such as further We quantified about proteins in MyD88, and NEMO IP data across about 21–40 IP samples. these proteins, the of as not LPS we in a of of LPS We detected proteins in IP proteins and which from interactors of the the number of identified proteins in identified in MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO data that in of the proteins in the IP the protein. We the proteins in the on LPS on this has high-confidence interactors of the proteins, and of the interactors have been in are for LPS-induced recruitment that to of in protein in the is that the of several proteins LPS stimulation, which could then the of these is that proteins to LPS Although the of protein not in cells, we to the The the interactors that are to and that are of NEMO are not in this the of these proteins of all interactors is In addition, we that analysis by requires be the of be of which are the for to the results by we the proteins quantitative in LPS on the we differential of IRAK family proteins in MyD88, TRAF6 and NEMO and a of and of in the signaling complexes of LPS and data IRAK1 recruitment and phosphorylation not in is that with NEMO LPS it is well known that and a complex in the in NEMO complex of a complex from the the stoichiometry in could be the of protein in and to the of MyD88, TIRAP, and in We identified high-confidence phosphosites in the interactors in MyD88 and NEMO of not phosphosites on of which is in the We that of the identified phosphosites on NEMO affected the of NEMO to NF-κB we the data of analysis an important resource for further LPS pathway MS data, all and have been through the We and for in with
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: