Fuel cell cathode catalyst layers deposited from a water-based catalyst ink formulation, using high water content and minimum volatile organic compounds, are investigated. Cathodes fabricated from a dispersion medium containing 96 wt% water are compared with cathodes fabricated from conventional alcohol-based inks containing 1-propanol–water 3 : 1 (w/w). The morphology of the two catalyst layers are similar, as are electrochemically-active surface areas at relative humidities of 100, 70 and 30% RH. Oxygen reduction kinetics obtained under fully humidified H2/O2 conditions exhibit similar Tafel slopes, 67 ± 3 mV per dec. However, cathodes prepared from water-based inks exhibit a lower H2/air fuel cell performance under 100, 70 and 30% RH while its porosity, obtained using mercury porosimetry, is slightly higher. EIS measurements obtained under high current density indicate that the mass transport resistance of the water-based catalyst layer is lower, which is consistent with porosimetric data, and suggests that factors other than mass transport limit the performance of the water-based cathode. The protonic resistance of the catalyst layers was found to be 105 and 145 mΩ cm2 for the propanol- and water-based catalyst layers, respectively. The differences are more pronounced when RH is decreased from 100 to 30%. This trend is consistent with the observed decrease in fuel cell performance under conditions of lower RH, and indicates that the higher proton resistance of the water-based catalyst layer is the cause of its lower fuel cell performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: