Monitoring phytoplankton classes in river networks is critical to understanding phytoplankton dynamics and to predicting the ecosystem response to changing land-use and seasons. Applicability of phytoplankton fluorescence as a quick and effective ecological monitoring approach is relatively unexplored in freshwater ecosystems. We used multivariate analyses of fluorescence from pigment extracted in 90% acetone to assess the variability in phytoplankton classes, herbivory, and organic matter quality in a freshwater river network. A total of four models developed by the parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) of fluorescence excitation and emission matrices identified six components: Model 1 (pheophytin-A and chlorophyll-A), Model 2 (chlorophyll-B and chlorophyll-C), Model 3 (pheophytin-B), and Model 4 (pheophytin-C). Redundancy analyses revealed that in the summer, urban and agricultural streams were abundant in chlorophylls, fresh organic matter, and organic nitrogen, whereas in winter, streams were high in phaeopigments. A slow-moving, light-limited wetland stream was an exception as high phaeopigment abundance was observed in both seasons. The PARAFAC components were used to develop a partial least-squares regression-based model ( r 2 = 0.53; Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency = 0.5; n = 147) that successfully predicted chlorophyll-A concentrations from an external subset of river water samples ( r 2 = 0.41; p < 0.0001; n = 75). Thus, combining multivariate analyses and fluorescence spectroscopy is useful for monitoring and predicting phytoplankton dynamics in large river networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhattacharya et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: