Evaluation of cytocentrifuge apparatus with special reference to the cellular recovery rate

Two types of commercially available cytocentrifuge apparatus (type A and type B apparatus) using disposable funnels were compared for percentage of cell recovery and degree of cell preservation. The cellularity of each cell suspension was determined using a Sysmex micro cell counter for blood analysis, and the cell recovery was obtained by counting cells in the total smeared area on the May-Grünwald Giemsa (MGG)-stained slide. Overall recovery rate by the type A apparatus was between 54.3% and 74.9% with a mean of 63.0%, whereas, the recovery rate for type B apparatus was between 30.6% and 51.8%, with a mean of 42.5%, indicating that the type A apparatus was significantly better. In the type A apparatus, a higher yield of all cells was obtained (69.7-74.9%) in the group of low cell counts (350 cells/0.5 ml), which was run for 10 minutes at 2,000 rpm. On the other hand, in the type B apparatus a higher yield of all cells was obtained (38.6-42.6%) in the group of low cell counts which was run for 10 minutes at 2,000 rpm. Cellular structure was better preserved on the slides in the type A apparatus. However, the percentage of ghost cells was somewhat higher in the type B apparatus. The cytocentrifugation of the type A apparatus consistently recovered a higher percentage of cells than with the type B apparatus. Using the type A apparatus, a high rate of cellular recovery, which is extremely important, such as for accurate morphological evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid, can be consistently obtained.