Key result
Different coping strategies during COVID-19 resulted in distinct wellbeing profiles, with the acceptance group showing the highest wellbeing and lowest burnout among 159 dual-career athletes.
Why the study?
This research aimed to understand the coping strategies and wellbeing of dual-career athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.
Cross-Sectional (n=159)
Dual-career athletes exhibited three distinct coping typologies during the COVID-19 pandemic, with acceptance associated with the best wellbeing and lowest burnout.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide support for dual-career athletes; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
This research aimed to understand the coping and wellbeing of dual-career athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 159 dual-career athletes completed a series of questionnaires that aimed to identify the coping strategies and their impact on the wellbeing of respondents during COVID-19 restrictions. The survey included measures of coping, wellbeing, burnout, and identity along with open-ended questions with the focus of change, coping, and support. Findings identified three coping approaches that have been employed by dual-career athletes: positive coping, negative coping, and acceptance. The three coping approaches also showed distinct wellbeing and burnout profiles. The negative coping group showed high indicators of burnout and poor wellbeing, whereas the acceptance group showed the highest scores on wellbeing and low indications of burnout. Based on the findings, it is recommended that dual-career support providers and stakeholders consider how best to support athletes that have not coped well and have experienced wellbeing issues during this time. It is also important to recognise the benefit a dual-career has provided to some individuals during this period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cartigny et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in COVID-19 pandemic impact on dual-career athletes (n=159). Coping strategies (positive, negative, acceptance) was evaluated on Wellbeing and burnout profiles. Different coping strategies during COVID-19 resulted in distinct wellbeing profiles, with the acceptance group showing the highest wellbeing and lowest burnout among 159 dual-career athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: