Chemical transport models are useful tools for evaluating source contributions and health impacts of PM 2.5 in the atmosphere. We recently found that concentrations of PM 2.5 compounds over Japan were much better reproduced by a volatility basis set model with an enhanced dry deposition velocity of HNO 3 and NH 3 compared with a two-product yield model. In this study, we evaluated the sensitivities to organic aerosol models of the simulated source contributions to PM 2.5 concentrations and of PM 2.5 -related mortality. Overall, the simulated source contributions to PM 2.5 were similar between the two models. However, because of the improvements associated with the volatility basis set model, the contributions of ammonia sources decreased, particularly in winter and spring, and contributions of biogenic and stationary evaporative sources increased in spring and summer. The improved model estimated that emission sources in Japan contributed 35%–48% of the PM 2.5 -related mortality in Japan. These values were higher than the domestic contributions to average PM 2.5 concentrations in Japan (26%–33%) because the domestic contributions were higher in higher population areas. These results indicate that control of both domestic and foreign emissions is necessary to reduce health impacts due to PM 2.5 in Japan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morino et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: