This paper examines a technique for evaluating the differences in value among rank-ordered alternatives using both analytical and intuitive decision making. This technique was applied to the ranking of alternative disinfection methods for both a water and wastewater plant. The paper further provides a framework for analyzing and reconciling the differences between analytical and intuitive decision models. Neither exists in a strictly mathematical closed form, so it is important to investigate both to understand where the differences in alternative recommendations reside. A framework such as the one presented here is key to unlocking the subjectivity inherent in and the difficulty surrounding value structure articulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
deMonsabert et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: