Tantalum (Ta) modified TiO 2 was synthesized using a sol-gel procedure and evaluated for use as an electrocatalyst support. Platinum nanoparticles were deposited on this support via the incipient wetness method. X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and nitrogen desorption were used to investigate their microstructure. Of the formulations studied, Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 possessed an adequate powder electronic conductivity of 0.2 S/cm. The capacitance of this Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 support changed by only 12% whereas the pseudocapacitance of a carbon benchmark changed by over 100% over 10,000 support stability test cycles (support stability test protocol: 1.0-1.5 V vs. RHE at a scan rate of 500 mV/s in a 0.1 M HClO 4 electrolyte at 25°C) under identical test conditions. The stability of 20% Pt/Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 , 20% Pt/C, and 46% Pt/C (commercial, TKK) catalysts were evaluated by monitoring the evolution of the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) under load cycling (load cycling protocol: 0.6-0.95 V vs. RHE with a dwell time of 3 s at either potentials in a 0.1 M HClO 4 electrolyte at 25°C). The loss in ECSA in 20% Pt/Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 was found to be 35% compared to 44-47% for 20% Pt/C and 46% Pt/C over 10,000 load cycles. 20% Pt/Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 yielded the following performance-related metrics: the ECSA of this electrocatalyst was 41 m 2 /g, the mass activity and area-specific activities for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) determined at 0.9 V vs. RHE in a 0.1 M HClO 4 electrolyte at 25°C were 62 mA/mg Pt and 151 μA/cm 2 Pt , respectively. Koutecky-Levich analysis carried out to evaluate ORR kinetics suggested that all 3 catalysts (20% Pt/Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 , 20% Pt/C and 46% Pt/C) demonstrated similar ORR mechanisms. We propose that Ta 0.3 Ti 0.7 O 2 shows outstanding promise as a corrosion-resistant alternative to carbon as an electrocatalyst support in polymer electrolyte fuel cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: