“Artificial corneas” have been attempted in severe corneal disease for at least 230 years, with largely disappointing results until recently. ‘The Boston Keratoprosthesis’ (B-Kpro) has been part of this history on and off for a half century. Developed from several previously known concepts, it was originally made of PMMA plastics in a collar button design (Type I), to be implanted into a corneal graft carrier and then transplanted to the patients’ cornea. (A Type II with an additional stem for lid penetration is occasionally used in end-stage dry eyes.) Management and device changes have over the years led to marked clinical improvements. Thus, postoperative infections have been drastically reduced by using low-dose prophylactic antibiotics. The corneal surface has been found to be well protected from evaporative damage by a soft contact lens or a conjunctional flap. Postoperative tissue melt around the device has been markedly reduced by improvement of nutrition from the aqueous (perforated back plates) and better anti-inflammatory strategies. Titanium alloys can be used for non-transparent parts to reduce inflammation and increase biointegration. Retroprosthesis membranes and retina complications have similarly been markedly reduced. However, post-operative glaucoma is still a stubborn problem that can cause long-term attrition of vision. Autoimmune diseases are particularly treacherous and B-KPros should not at present be used routinely. About 12,000 Boston Keratoprostheses have so far been distributed world-wide. Robust research is presently on-going to improve long-term safety, especially for the developing world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dohlman et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: