This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Rice sheath rot has progressively developed into a growing threat to global rice production, particularly in intensively managed systems conducive to disease development. Therefore, accurate identification of the causal pathogen and the development of sustainable management strategies represent urgent scientific requirements. In this study, we isolated the causal organism of rice sheath rot from infected rice tissues and identified it as Fusarium verticillioides based on multi-locus sequence analysis. Eight endophytic bacterial strains were recovered from healthy rice root systems. Among the isolates, Bacillus velezensis isolate 7-A exhibited the strongest antifungal activity against F. verticillioides. This isolate demonstrated broad-spectrum antifungal activity, with inhibition rates ranging from 54.8% to 71.8%. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA and gyrB gene sequences identified it as B. velezensis. Further characterization revealed that B. velezensis 7-A is capable of secreting proteases and synthesizing siderophores. The filtered liquid from sterile fermentation markedly inhibited the growth of mycelium in F. verticillioides and induced marked morphological abnormalities. Liquid LC-MS analysis identified multiple antifungal active substances, including camphor, ginkgolides B, salicin, cinnamic acid, hydroxygenkwanin, stearamide, β-carotene, and others. A pot experiment demonstrated that the fermentation broth of B. velezensis 7-A effectively suppressed the occurrence of rice sheath rot, achieving a relative control efficacy of 61.3%, which is comparable to that of a 10% carbendazim water-dispersible granule (WDG). Additionally, isolate 7-A enhances plant disease resistance by activating the activities of key defense enzymes. These findings provide preliminary insights into its potential application in integrated and sustainable disease management programs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: