Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interaction between a cationic copolymer (acrylamide−trimethylaminoethyl acrylate) P(AAm−TMA) and an anionic perfluorinated surfactant (lithium perfluorooctanoate) (LiPFO) was studied using 1 H and 19 F NMR. To clarify the effect of the charge density, copolymers having a different composition of comonomers have been used. In each copolymer−surfactant system the presence of the polyelectrolyte in solution strongly modifies the 19 F chemical shifts. Consequently, a strong polymer−surfactant interaction is evidenced. A complete saturation of the cationic charges of the polymer is clearly detectable, followed by a partial precipitation and subsequent redissolution of the system. The chemical shifts and line widths observed have been interpreted as dependent on two main factors: the aggregation state of the system and the rate of exchange among different sites. 1 H spectra, which run at a constant concentration of polymer and different concentrations of surfactant, appear rather broad and poorly defined. The spectral broadening becomes extremely marked at certain value C of the surfactant concentration, where a strong super-Lorentzian line appears, surmounted by weak sharp lines in which the chemical shift is still visible. Increasing the charge density the critical concentration C increases. A further increase in the surfactant concentration causes a sharp precipitation which is accompanied by the disappearance of the super-Lorentzian resonance. This critical concentration value C may be interpreted as being due to the so-called “cac”, i.e., the concentration of critical aggregation. At a higher surfactant concentration, after the resolubilization, a super-Lorentzian 19 F line is observed superimposed again by a sharp spectrum. The presence of the super-Lorentzian 19 F line can be interpreted as an indicator of the incoming gelification of the mixture. A model of interaction has been proposed on the basis of the results obtained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Proietti et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: