Key result
Severe hypercholesterolemia with an FH mutation is linked to a ~4-fold higher incident CHD risk.
Why the study?
Does severe hypercholesterolemia and/or FH genotype increase the risk of incident CHD events in individuals without baseline CHD?
Cohort (n=21,426)
Yes
Does severe hypercholesterolemia and/or FH genotype increase the risk of incident CHD events in individuals without baseline CHD?
The presence of a familial hypercholesterolemia mutation is associated with a significantly higher risk of incident coronary heart disease, even when LDL-C levels are only modestly elevated.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“Yes, high cholesterol is worse for you than low cholesterol, but high cholesterol that's related to one of these single-gene disorders is particularly risky and even riskier than the polygenic variety.”
May support FH genotyping to refine CHD risk assessment beyond LDL-C; leaves open whether genotype-guided therapy improves outcomes.
amilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder characterized by markedly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from birth that often causes premature coronary heart disease (CHD). 1 FH can be diagnosed with established clinical criteria such as the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria with or without genetic testing. 1 This study aimed to quantify the risks for incident CHD events associated with severe hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL) with or without an FH genotype.This analysis used data from 6 population-based prospective cohort studies: (1) Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, (2) Cardiovascular Risk Development in Young Adults Study, (3) Cardiovascular Health Study, (4) Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort, (5) Jackson Heart Study, and (6) Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Study.All study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review boards at participating institutions, and all participants provided written informed consent.The analysis was restricted to 21 426 participants without existing CHD at baseline who underwent whole-genome sequencing.Because of the sensitive nature of the data collected for this study, requests to access the data set from qualified researchers trained in human subject con-fidentiality protocols may be sent to the coordinating center of each study cohort.Demographic characteristics, LDL-C, and other cardiovascular risk factors were measured with standardized protocols in each study.For individuals reporting use of lipid-lowering therapy at the time of LDL-C measurements, detreated LDL-C values were estimated by applying a 30% increase in LDL-C. 2 We analyzed gene sequences of 3 FH genes (low-density lipoprotein receptor [LDLR], apolipoprotein B [APOB], and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 [PCSK9]).3 Variant annotations based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria and reports from the ClinGen and ClinVar expert panels were used to determine the pathogenicity of a variant.Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the associations of LDL-C and FH genotype with incident CHD events.Age was used as the time scale, and models were stratified by study cohort and adjusted for race and ethnicity, sex, smoking status, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, use of lipid-lowering medications, and use of antihypertensive medications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Without existing coronary heart disease (n=21,426). Severe hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL) and/or Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) genotype vs. Individuals with LDL-C <190 mg/dL and no FH mutation was evaluated on Incident CHD events (HR 4.3, 95% CI 2.3-7.8). The presence of both severe hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL) and an FH mutation was associated with a 4.3-fold increased risk of incident coronary heart disease compared to individuals with LDL-C <190 mg/dL and no FH mutation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: