Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tetrakis( N, N -dimethylhydroxylamido)silane, Si(ONMe 2 ) 4 ( 1 ), and the analogous ethyl compound, Si(ONEt 2 ) 4 ( 2 ), have been prepared by the reaction of silicon tetrachloride with 4 equiv of the corresponding lithium N, N -dialkylhydroxylamide. The compounds have been characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, NMR spectroscopy of the nuclei 1 H, 13 C, 15 N [including the determination of 1 J ( 29 Si 15 N) coupling constants], 17 O, and 29 Si, and nominal and high-resolution mass spectrometry. A crystal structure determination on 1 showed the molecule to be (4 + 4)-coordinate with short Si···N contacts [2.514(3)−2.555(3) Å] and narrow SiON angles [109.1° on average]. For comparison, the crystal structure of the isoelectronic Si(OCHMe 2 ) 4 ( in situ grown crystal) was determined, showing the absence of β-donor interactions and an SiOC angle of 124.7(1)°. Ab initio calculations have been performed on the model compounds Si(ONH 2 ) 4 and H 3 SiONMe 2 as well as the electronegatively substituted fluoro derivatives FH 2 SiONMe 2 and F 3 SiONMe 2 up to the MP2/6-311G** level of theory. Si(ONH 2 ) 4 is predicted to adopt C 2 symmetry and to have an SiON angle of only 109.5°, while the interactions in the other model compounds are predicted to be much stronger, as indicated by their SiON angles: H 3 SiONMe 2 102.5°, FH 2 SiONMe 2 90.0°, and F 3 SiONMe 2 93.8°. The results are discussed with respect to the consequences of enlargement of the coordination sphere at the silicon atom, the unique chemical behavior of O -silylhydroxylamines (in particular their fast nucleophilic substitutions reactions), and the resulting use of this class of compounds in the silicone rubber industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitzel et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: