Key result
Vaccination against PCV2 at 6 weeks of age in piglets derived from vaccinated sows provided the highest clinical and virological protection against natural infection compared to other vaccination timings or placebo.
Why the study?
Does PCV2 vaccination at different ages improve clinical protection and immune response in piglets derived from vaccinated sows?
RCT (n=1,200)
Double-blind
Randomized block design across litters
No
Does PCV2 vaccination at different ages improve clinical protection and immune response in piglets derived from vaccinated sows?
p-value: p=<0.05
In piglets with maternally derived immunity, vaccination against PCV2 at 6 weeks of age provides optimal clinical and virological protection compared to vaccination at 4 or 8 weeks.
Vaccination at 6 weeks may optimize schedules in maternally immune piglets; leaves open validation in commercial herds and larger trials.
BACKGROUND: This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical protection, the level of Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) viremia and the immune response (antibodies and IFN-γ secreting cells (SC)) in piglets derived from PCV2 vaccinated sows and themselves vaccinated against PCV2 at different age, namely at 4, 6 and 8 weeks. The cohort study has been carried out over three subsequent production cycles (replicates). At the start/enrolment, 46 gilts were considered at first mating, bled and vaccinated. At the first, second and third farrowing, dams were bled and re-vaccinated at the subsequent mating after weaning piglets. Overall 400 piglets at each farrowing (first, second and third) were randomly allocated in three different groups (100 piglets/group) based on the timing of vaccination (4, 6 or 8 weeks of age). A fourth group was kept non-vaccinated (controls). Piglets were vaccinated intramuscularly with one dose (2 mL) of a commercial PCV2a-based subunit vaccine (Porcilis® PCV). Twenty animals per group were bled at weaning and from vaccination to slaughter every 4 weeks for the detection of PCV2 viremia, humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. Clinical signs and individual treatments (morbidity), mortality, and body weight of all piglets were recorded. RESULTS: All vaccination schemes (4, 6 and 8 weeks of age) were able to induce an antibody response and IFN-γ SC. The highest clinical and virological protection sustained by immune reactivity was observed in pigs vaccinated at 6 weeks of age. Overall, repeated PCV2 vaccination in sows at mating and the subsequent higher levels of maternally derived antibodies did not significantly interfere with the induction of both humoral and cell-mediated immunity in their piglets after vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of vaccination in sows at mating and in piglets at 6 weeks of age was more effective for controlling PCV2 natural infection, than other vaccination schemas, thus sustaining that some interference of MDA with the induction of an efficient immune response could be considered. In conclusion, optimal vaccination strategy needs to balance the levels of passive immunity, the management practices and timing of infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martelli et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection (n=1,200). Porcilis® PCV (PCV2a-based subunit vaccine) vs. Placebo (adjuvant only) was evaluated on Proportion of viremic animals and viral load (p=<0.05). Vaccination against PCV2 at 6 weeks of age in piglets derived from vaccinated sows provided the highest clinical and virological protection against natural infection compared to other vaccination timings or placebo.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: