PURPOSE: To analyze the implications of different reference points on the read-out of epithelial thickness mapping. METHODS: A simulation for changing the reference point from normal-to-the-surface tangent to parallel vertical sections quantifying its effect on the read-out of epithelial thickness mapping has been developed. The simulation includes a simple modeling of corneal epithelial profiles and allows the analytical quantification of the differences in the read-out from normal-to-the-surface tangent to parallel vertical sections epithelial thickness mapping. RESULTS: The difference in the read-out between parallel vertical sections and normal-to-the-surface tangent epithelial thickness mapping increases for steeper corneas, but it is not largely affected by asphericity. The difference increases for thicker epithelia. CONCLUSIONS: The reference point for determining the readout of epithelial thickness mapping should be taken into account when interpreting output. Using conventional epithelial thickness map readings (normal-to-the surface tangent) in transepithelial ablations (representing close to parallel vertical sections) may result in induced refractive errors that can be quantified using simple theoretical simulations, because the center-to-periphery progression of the corneal epithelial profile deviates from the progression of the ablated one. Adjustments for the epithelial thickness read-out or, alternatively, for the target sphere can be easily derived. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(2):200-207.].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arba‐Mosquera et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: