Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a supervised fitness centre-based exercise programme with an unsupervised home-based exercise programme on cardiorespiratory fitness and psychosocial functioning in people with traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Multi-centre, assessor-blinded, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-two participants with severe traumatic brain injuries, who could walk at a speed exceeding 1 m/sec, discharged from 3 brain injury units. INTERVENTIONS: The fitness centre group completed a combined fitness and strength training exercise programme supervised by a personal trainer in a local fitness centre 3 times per week for 12 weeks. The home group completed a similar exercise programme unsupervised at home. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cardiorespiratory fitness measured using the modified 20-m shuttle test. RESULTS: Both groups improved in fitness: the maximal velocity achieved on the modified 20-m shuttle test increased with intervention and was maintained at follow-up. However, the difference between groups was not significant (mean between-group difference (95% confidence interval) 0 m/sec (-0.6 to 0.6) at the end of intervention). There were also no between-group differences in psychosocial functioning at the end of intervention or at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both interventions were equally effective at improving cardiorespiratory fitness in adults with traumatic brain injuries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassett et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: