Experimental study demonstrates increased wear resistance and surface hardness in 3D-printed denture resin, suggesting thermal-pressure treatment optimizes additive dental prosthetics.
Three-dimensionally (3D)-printed denture teeth are increasingly used in clinical practice; however, their wear resistance and surface hardness may be insufficient for long-term clinical application. Moreover, the effect of post-treatment under elevated temperature and pressure on these properties remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of such post-treatment on the wear resistance and Vickers hardness of 3D-printed denture teeth resin. One hundred disk-shaped specimens (10 × 2 mm) were 3D-printed using Dima denture teeth resin and randomly assigned to four post-treatment groups (121 °C at 2 bar for 4, 30, 60, and 90 min) and one untreated control group. Within each group, specimens were allocated for wear resistance (n = 10) and Vickers hardness (n = 10) testing. Wear resistance was measured using an impact-sliding wear testing machine in a polymethyl methacrylate slurry, while Vickers hardness was measured using a hardness tester under a 50 g load with a 15 s dwell time. Statistical analyses included one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal–Wallis, and Welch’s ANOVA (α = 0.05). All post-treatment groups exhibited significantly lower depth loss and higher hardness than the control group (p < 0.05). Specimens post-treated for ≥30 min exhibited significantly lower volume loss than the control group (p < 0.05). The 121 °C/90 min group demonstrated the highest wear resistance and Vickers hardness. Within the limitations of this study, post-treatment under elevated temperature and pressure significantly improved the wear resistance and Vickers hardness of the tested 3D-printed denture teeth resin, with the 90 min protocol yielding the greatest enhancement. Thus, thermal-pressure post-treatment may be a promising approach for enhancing the mechanical performance of additively manufactured denture teeth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: