Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
(S)-9-(3-Hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)adenine [(S)-HPMPA], (S)-9-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)-2,6-diaminopurine [(S)-HPMPDAP], cyclic (S)-HPMPA [(S)-cHPMPA], 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethoxyethyl)-2,6-diaminopurine (PMEDAP), and (S)-1-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)cytosine [(S)-HPMPC] were examined for their inhibitory effects on Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) replication. The 50% effective concentrations for inhibition of viral DNA replication were 0.16, 0.03, 2.0, 1.5, and 0.08 microM for PMEDAP, (S)-HPMPC, (S)-HPMPDAP, (S)-cHPMPA, and (S)-HPMPA, respectively. The relative efficacies based on the in vitro therapeutic index was (S)-HPMPC (5,000) greater than PMEDAP (1,000) = (S)-HPMPA (1,000) greater than (S)-cHPMPA (136) greater than (S)-HPMPDAP (78). Certain ratios of combinations of (S)-HPMPC with 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine produced a synergistic inhibitory effect on EBV genome replication, but others exhibited an antagonistic effect. These results indicate that this series of acyclic nucleoside phosphonate analogs, and in particular (S)-HPMPC, are potent and selective anti-EBV agents in vitro.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: