Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants, particularly dabigatran, offer clinical benefits over no treatment and warfarin for preventing thromboembolic complications in patients with liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Comorbid liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation present complex bleeding and thrombosis risks, requiring summarized data on global hemostasis assessment methods and anticoagulant safety and efficacy.
Do anticoagulants and global hemostasis assessment methods improve the management of thromboembolic and bleeding risks in patients with liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation?
Do anticoagulants and global hemostasis assessment methods improve the management of thromboembolic and bleeding risks in patients with liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation?
Anticoagulant therapy, particularly with DOACs like dabigatran, appears beneficial for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and liver cirrhosis, and should ideally be guided by global hemostasis tests like ROTEM/TEG.
Nowadays the comorbid pathology of liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation has been widely discussed and reported in the literature in the light of recent findings from the study of the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulants in this category of patients. The review is devoted to summarizing the existing data on the comorbid course of these diseases from the point of view of the impact of bleeding and thrombosis on the quality of life and mortality of patients and the possibility of using new methods of diagnosis and prevention of these complications. The purpose of the review is to focus the attention of physicians and researches on the relevance and prevalence of comorbid course of liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation, their complications, and discuss the benefits and possibilities of applying global methods of hemostasis assessment and anticoagulants in clinical practice. This article examines the main pathophysiological aspects of «rebalanced hemostasis» theory in liver coagulopathies, its effect on the onset of bleeding and thrombotic events, and considering the clinical benefit of the use of anticoagulants. The disadvantages of traditional coagulation assessment tests compared to the benefits of thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and thromboelastography (TEG), general fulfilling principles and evaluation of their indicators are discussed. Existing research findings on the safety and efficacy of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation compared with no treatment are highlighted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chernyavsky et al. (2021) conducted a review in Liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin or no treatment was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants, particularly dabigatran, offer clinical benefits over no treatment and warfarin for preventing thromboembolic complications in patients with liver cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: