Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It has been found that the perturbation in the geomagnetic field produced by the auroral electrojet also perturbs the pitch-angle distribution of the precipitated electrons that are the dominant contributors to the auroral ionization within which it is assumed the auroral electrojet flows. To study this interaction in detail, a computer program has been developed for model calculations. This program computes: (1) the electron concentration profile in the ionosphere from a given pitch-angle and energy distribution of the ionizing electrons, and (2) the changes in the pitch-angle distribution created by the geomagnetic field deformations caused by the auroral electrojet current system itself. Results from preliminary computations are discussed. It is shown that the interaction can cause significant time variations in an initially time-stationary electron precipitation event. Thus, for the first time it is seen that naturally occurring atmospheric ‘feed-back’ effects can account for some of the dynamic auroral variations without requiring the auroral source itself to vary in time. The variations are governed by the pitch-angle distribution and the total flux of precipitated electrons, as well as by the normal loss parameters in the upper atmosphere. For medium-to-strong electron precipitation events, the calculated periodicity of the variations lies in the range 50–200 seconds, which is in agreement with some of the direct observations of auroral electron periodicities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mæhlum et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: