Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantum chemical ab initio calculations are performed for the magnetic exchange coupling in binuclear chlorine-bridged Co(II) complexes of the form L 3 CoCl 3 CoL 3 . In order to simplify the calculations, the terminal ligands are replaced with He-type model ligands L. The calculations are carried out at the restricted open-shell Hartree−Fock (ROHF), complete active space SCF (CASSCF), and valence configuration interaction (VCI) levels, with inclusion of spin−orbit coupling and external magnetic fields. The 12-fold degenerate 4 T 1g ground state of the Co 2+ cation in a perfect octahedral ligand field is split by the trigonal distortion in the complex and by spin−orbit coupling. Both effects have the same order of magnitude, 200−500 cm - 1 . The ground state of either cation is a Kramers doublet, E 1/2, separated by about 300 cm - 1 from the lowest excited states. The coupling of the two E 1/2 ground states through the chlorine bridges is antiferromagnetic; the binuclear complex has a nondegenerate A 2 ‘ ‘ ground state, followed by a nondegenerate first excited A 1 ‘ state 15 cm - 1 above the ground state and a 2-fold degenerate second excited E‘ ‘ state at 57 cm - 1 . The next states are about 300 cm - 1 higher in energy. From these energy levels the magnetic susceptibility χ is calculated by means of a Boltzmann average. χ shows a substantial anisotropy: χ ∥ is rather large because of a first-order Zeeman splitting of the E‘ ‘ state in a magnetic field parallel to the molecular axis, while χ ⊥ is small since it is only caused by second-order Zeeman effects. The calculated temperature dependence of χ agrees fairly well with experimental data; however, a phenomenological Heisenberg−Dirac−van Vleck Hamiltonian cannot be used to describe the measured susceptibility data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fink et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: