Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The response of various composite structures to transverse loading was studied through im-pact and quasi-static testing. The AS4/3501-6 graphtie/epoxy composite structures considered have a [±4.5n/0n]s, layup configuration and include convex and concave shell sections, plates, and full cylinders. The impact tests fall within the so-called large-mass, low-velocity regime, where previous findings for composite plates indicate that quasi-static tests represent the impact response accurately; i.e., impact and quasi-static tests can be considered equivalent. This equivalence includes damage if the same peak force is reached in both the impact and quasi-static tests. The present work extends the impact and quasi-static equivalence from composite plates to various composite (shell) structures, including shells with an instability. Over nearly the entire range of impact events and shell structures considered, impact and quasi-static responses (including damage extent and distribution) are found to be equivalent. A small number of the most flexible (large-span, thin) specimens displayed a large-amplitude oscillatory impact loading response that was not observed for the quasi-static tests. These few specimens indicate one regime where the equivalence is limited The general equivalence demonstrated here for a wide range of composite structures has important implications for testing and design of damage-tolerant aerospace components. The findings also suggest that quasi-static experimentation can often be used to simulate the impact response (particularly damage) of composite shell structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weirdie et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: