Key result
Butorphanol combined with propofol significantly reduced apnea time (57.74 vs 78.12 seconds) and prolonged recovery time compared to a fentanyl-propofol combination during laryngeal mask airway insertion.
Why the study?
Does butorphanol compared to fentanyl as a coinduction agent with propofol improve apnoea time, recovery time, and sedation scores in patients undergoing elective surgery with LMA?
RCT (n=100)
Randomly selected and divided into two groups
No
Does butorphanol compared to fentanyl as a coinduction agent with propofol improve apnoea time, recovery time, and sedation scores in patients undergoing elective surgery with LMA?
Propofol-butorphanol combination is a safer alternative to propofol-fentanyl for LMA insertion considering respiratory and recovery profiles.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers shorter apnea but longer recovery with butorphanol-propofol for LMA insertion; extends RCT data on opioid coinduction alternatives.
BACKGROUND: Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a supraglottic device which requires lesser depth of anaesthesia, evokes lesser hemodynamic response and causes lesser stimulation of airway as compared to traditional definitive airway device endotracheal tube. Its placement is possible without muscle relaxants thereby allowing maintenance of anaesthesia on spontaneous respiration thus preventing apnoea or minimizing apnoea time. Propofol, the commonly used induction agent, causes cardiorespiratory depression at higher induction doses. To attenuate this, co-induction agents combined with propofol has been a regular I/V anaesthetic technique these days. AIM: Comparing apnoea time, recovery time and sedation scores using propofol-fentanyl and propofol-butorphanol combination. METHODOLOGY: Hundred patients scheduled for various elective surgical procedures were randomly selected and divided into two groups of 50 each. As coinduction drug Group F received fentanyl and Group B received butorphanol. In both the groups induction was achieved with I/V propofol and LMA was placed. Apnoea time was noted after induction. Recovery time and sedation scores were recorded after anaesthetic agents were turned off. Statistically postoperative sedation was significantly higher in group B than in group F at 1/2 hr but clinically, majority were responding to verbal commands. At 1 hour no significant difference in sedation was noted between the groups. CONCLUSION: Considering respiratory and recovery profile propofol -butorphanol combination is a safer alternative to propofol-fentanyl combination for LMA insertion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dwivedi et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia (n=100). Propofol and butorphanol vs. Propofol 2.5 mg/kg IV and fentanyl 1.5 µg/kg IV was evaluated on Apnea time (seconds) (p=0.000). Butorphanol combined with propofol significantly reduced apnea time (57.74 vs 78.12 seconds) and prolonged recovery time compared to a fentanyl-propofol combination during laryngeal mask airway insertion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: