Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The excessive input of nitrogen (N) fertilizer and irrigation water to greenhouse vegetable production systems leads to N losses via nitrate () leaching, ammonia (NH3) volatilization and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. Besides management of N fertilizer and irrigation inputs, the addition of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) has also been shown to mitigate N losses from soils. A greenhouse experiment was set up to identify the effects of combining DCD with recommended N and irrigation management on leaching, NH3 volatilization and N2O emissions under intensive vegetable production of tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). The five treatments were: (A) control + TMI (traditional managed irrigation); (B) TN (traditional N rate applied at 410 kg N ha−1) + TMI; (C) RN (recommended N rate applied at 210 kg N ha−1) + DCD (21 kg ha−1) + OMI (optimum managed irrigation); (D) 80%RN (N rate applied at 80% of the recommended N rate, 168 kg N ha−1) + DCD (16.8 kg ha−1) + OMI; and (E) 120%RN (N rate applied at 120% of the recommend N rate, 252 kg N ha−1) + DCD (25.2 kg ha−1) + OMI. DCD was applied at the rate of 10% of the N application rate. The results showed that the recommended N rate and irrigation with the addition of DCD (RN + DCD + OMI, 80%RN + DCD + OMI, and 120%RN + DCD + OMI) can significantly reduce N loss as , NH3 and N2O. The average concentrations in the top soil depth were decreased by 49.34–55.54%, total NH3 volatilization were decreased by 20.61–41.51%, and N2O emission factors were reduced by 84.07–96.19%. In addition, the utilization efficiency of N was enhanced. However, there was no significant effect of the recommended N rate and DCD plus optimum managed irrigation on tomato yield. Overall, these results suggest that applying 80%RN + DCD + OMI may provide a practicable option for both mitigating N losses and improving utilization efficiency of N under intensive greenhouse vegetable production systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: