We have studied how the calculation of electronic and vibrational contributions to nonlinear optical properties of three representative π-conjugated organic molecules is affected by the choice of basis set and the inclusion of electron correlation effects. The 6-31G basis does not always provide even qualitative accuracy. For semiquantitative accuracy a 6-31+G(d) basis is sufficient. Although, as compared to QCISD, a second-order Møller–Plesset (MP2) treatment often yields a substantial fraction of the electron correlation contribution, our MP2 results for the separate electronic and vibrational terms are not consistently of semiquantitative accuracy. Nevertheless, at the MP2 level the ratio between the vibrational and electronic contributions is satisfactorily reproduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torrent‐Sucarrat et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: