Congenital Absence of the Vas Deferens: A Review of the Literature and Report of Three Cases

No AccessJournal of Urology1 Jan 1950Congenital Absence of the Vas Deferens: A Review of the Literature and Report of Three Cases Robert E. Nelson Robert E. NelsonRobert E. Nelson More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)68750-0AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1950 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByGoldstein M and Schlossberg S (2018) Men with Congenital Absence of the Vas Deferens Often Have Seminal VesiclesJournal of Urology, VOL. 140, NO. 1, (85-86), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1988.van Wingerden J and Franz I (2018) The Presence of a Caput Epididymidis in Congenital Absence of the Vas DeferensJournal of Urology, VOL. 131, NO. 4, (764-766), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1984.Walker W and Bowles W (2018) Transvesical Seminal Vesiculostomy in Treatment of Congenital Obstruction of Seminal Vesicles: Case ReportJournal of Urology, VOL. 99, NO. 3, (324-326), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1968.Pearman R (2018) Congenital Absence of the Testicle: MonorchismJournal of Urology, VOL. 85, NO. 4, (599-601), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1961.Merren D and Kelley R (2018) Congenital Absence of the Vas Deferens: Report of Three CasesJournal of Urology, VOL. 68, NO. 1, (377-382), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1952. Volume 63Issue 1January 1950Page: 176-182 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1950 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Robert E. Nelson More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...