Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Imipenem-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were divided into two categories: (i) isolates that were moderately resistant to imipenem (MIC 6.25 mg/L) that produced trace amounts of protein D2 detected with immunoblotting using anti-protein D2 antibody, but not when stained with Coomassie blue and had inducible class 1 beta-lactamase expression; (ii) isolates that were highly resistant to several beta-lactams, including meropenem, with no protein D2 by staining or immunoblotting and had stably derepressed beta-lactamase. Laboratory strains were isolated and analyzed: (i) mutants lacking protein D2, or (ii) lacking protein D2 and producing stably derepressed beta-lactamase with carbapenem resistance similar to the clinical isolates. (iii) mutants producing undetectable beta-lactamase which were four-fold more susceptible to imipenem than the mutant producing stably derepressed beta-lactamase or the strain with inducible beta-lactamase. These data suggests that beta-lactamase and outer membrane permeability govern meropenem-resistance in P. aeruginosa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satake et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: