Key result
Volume control and dry-weight optimization should precede pharmacotherapy for hypertension in hemodialysis.
Why the study?
Hypertension in haemodialysis is common and prognostically important, but difficult to manage due to imprecise blood pressure measurement, dynamic extracellular volume, and low blood pressure potentially reflecting underlying pathology rather than therapeutic success.
Management of hypertension in haemodialysis requires accurate measurement, strict volume control, and tailored pharmacotherapy, with beta-blockers currently having the strongest evidence base.
Supports ABPM and volume-first strategy in HD hypertension; leaves open beta-blocker outcome trials.
Hypertension in haemodialysis is common, prognostically important, and difficult to manage because blood pressure measurement is often imprecise, extracellular volume is dynamic, and low blood pressure may reflect heart failure, frailty, impaired forward flow, autonomic dysfunction, or excessive ultrafiltration rather than therapeutic success. Contemporary evidence supports ambulatory blood pressure monitoring as the reference standard and home blood pressure monitoring as the most practical longitudinal method, while accepted targets remain unsettled. Treatment should begin with standardised assessment of interdialytic blood pressure burden and sodium-volume control through dietary sodium restriction, dialysate sodium consideration, dry-weight reassessment, ultrafiltration management, and adequate treatment time. This sequence helps distinguish true treatment resistance from pseudoresistance caused by dialysis-unit measurement artefacts, volume excess, short treatment time, sodium burden, medication nonadherence, poorly timed dosing, or dialytic drug removal. Once persistent hypertension is confirmed despite sodium-volume and dry-weight-oriented care, pharmacotherapy becomes necessary. Beta-blockers have the strongest outcome-linked support in haemodialysis, whereas calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are practical complementary agents, and conventional renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade is best reserved for selected indications. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) should be considered cautiously because recent large dialysis trials and updated meta-analytic evidence have not confirmed clear cardiovascular benefit. Sacubitril/valsartan is biologically plausible when hypertension coexists with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, left ventricular dysfunction, recurrent congestion, or high natriuretic peptide burden. However, it should be framed as a promising but not yet established selective option rather than routine escalation therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furuto et al. (2026) conducted a review in Hypertension in haemodialysis. Blood pressure management and volume control was evaluated. Management of hypertension in haemodialysis should prioritize sodium-volume control and dry-weight reassessment before escalating to pharmacotherapy such as beta-blockers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: