Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of environmental pollution on DNA adducts in humans was analysed in a highly industrialized area of Poland. Coded samples of white blood cell DNA were analysed by 32P-postlabelling and immunoassay from three populations: coke workers, exposed occupationally to high levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); residents of the towns around cokeries (local controls); and residents from rural Poland (countryside controls). Local controls exhibited adduct levels and patterns similar to those of coke workers, while the levels in rural controls were 2-3 times lower. The results, based on coded samples and two different assays, suggest that environmental pollution is likely to contribute to the adduct levels in local controls. Furthermore, the results show that the levels of aromatic adducts in white blood cell DNA do not linearily relate to ambient air levels of PAHs but other sources such as food may be important contributors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hemminki et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: