Key result
Dual-energy computed tomography demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for bowel necrosis, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.65 and specificity of 0.83.
Why the study?
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has emerged to assess intestinal viability, but its diagnostic accuracy for bowel necrosis in clinical practice remains undefined.
Does dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) accurately diagnose bowel necrosis in patients with acute abdomen and bowel ischemia?
Cohort (n=28)
Evaluators blinded to confirmed diagnoses
No
Does dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) accurately diagnose bowel necrosis in patients with acute abdomen and bowel ischemia?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 0.65 (95% CI 0.52-0.77)
DECT demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for bowel necrosis in patients with acute abdomen and bowel ischemia, suggesting it is clinically valuable but not definitive.
Moderate accuracy limits DECT's standalone use for bowel necrosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Introduction Immediate diagnosis of bowel necrosis in acute abdominal conditions is essential for proper treatment. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has recently emerged as a tool to assess intestinal viability in bowel ischemia. However, DECT's diagnostic accuracy for bowel necrosis in clinical practice remains undefined. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study at a Japanese tertiary care hospital assessed DECT's diagnostic accuracy for bowel necrosis. We included patients who underwent emergency operations for abdominal conditions with bowel ischemia from April 2013 to March 2022. Patients without DECT were excluded. The reference standard was bowel necrosis determined by surgical findings. Four evaluators (two residents and two specialists) independently reviewed DECT images blinded to confirmed diagnoses. We calculated pooled and individual sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and accuracy. Results Twenty-eight patients were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.65 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.77) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.70-0.92), respectively. Residents demonstrated higher sensitivity than specialists. Pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.76 (95% CI, 2.02-7.00) and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.29-0.61). Overall accuracy was 0.73 (95%CI, 0.64-0.81). Inter-evaluator agreement was moderate (Fleiss' kappa, 0.42). Conclusion DECT demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for bowel necrosis in this Japanese tertiary care setting. While clinically valuable, DECT's diagnostic capability was not definitive. To optimize DECT's potential, future research should employ disease-specific image reconstruction techniques and provide evaluators with specialized DECT interpretation training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute abdomen with bowel ischemia (n=28). Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) vs. Surgical findings (reference standard) was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity for bowel necrosis (Sensitivity 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.77). Dual-energy computed tomography demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for bowel necrosis, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.65 and specificity of 0.83.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: