Key result
Transplantation of apoptotic bodies after myocardial infarction in rats did not improve left ventricular function despite increased angiogenesis, demonstrating that inflammatory reactions are critical for functional recovery.
Why the study?
Does transplantation of apoptotic bodies improve left ventricular function in a rat model of chronic myocardial infarction?
Does transplantation of apoptotic bodies improve left ventricular function in a rat model of chronic myocardial infarction?
p-value: p=not significant
This preclinical study demonstrates that neoangiogenesis alone, induced by apoptotic bodies, is insufficient to improve heart function after chronic myocardial infarction, highlighting the critical role of inflammatory reactions in scar remodeling.
Apoptotic body transplantation fails to restore LV function post-MI in rats despite angiogenesis; leaves open whether inflammation-targeted strategies are needed for remodeling.
Cell transplantation therapy is considered a novel and promising strategy in regenerative medicine. Recent studies point out that paracrine effects and inflammation induced by transplanted cells are key factors for the improvement of myocardial function. The present study aims at differentiating paracrine effects from inflammatory reactions after cell transplantation. Therefore, in vitro induced apoptotic bodies were transplanted after myocardial infarction in a rat model. Eight weeks after transplantation, the functional results showed no improvement in left ventricular function. Histological analysis revealed no significant differences in the amount of infiltrated cells and collagen content did not differ among the four groups, which sustains the functional data. Surprisingly, angiogenesis increased in groups with apoptotic bodies derived from HUVEC and endothelial progenitor cells, but not from fibroblasts. A complex genetic analysis of apoptotic bodies indicated that miRNAs could be responsible for these changes. Our study demonstrates that inflammatory reaction is critical for scar remodelling and improvement of the heart function after late cell therapy, while neoangiogenesis alone is not sufficient to improve heart function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander Schuh (2014) studied Myocardial Infarction (n=30). Apoptotic bodies (from HUVEC, EPCs, or fibroblasts) vs. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was evaluated on Ejection fraction (p=not significant). Transplantation of apoptotic bodies after myocardial infarction in rats did not improve left ventricular function despite increased angiogenesis, demonstrating that inflammatory reactions are critical for functional recovery.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: