Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report the low temperature negative magnetoresistance and magnetization of molecular beam epitaxy grown (InSb)1−xYx for a range of yttrium concentrations (0.03%⩽x⩽4.0%). Our experimental results from x-ray diffraction, Hall effect, and magnetization measurements suggest that the yttrium atoms are located as interstitials in the InSb lattice and hence do not hybridize their outer shell d electrons with the InSb band leading to localized moments. Although the magnetization versus magnetic field (B) data do not fit brilliouin function for all the temperatures studied, we clearly observe a correlation between the measured negative magnetoresistance and the magnetic moment. We believe that the s–d exchange interaction between the localized electrons of Y atoms and the conduction electrons gives rise to the large negative magnetoresistance observed. A theoretical model is used to explain the scattering mechanism. According to this model, when the conduction electrons in the lower subband of InSb have energy E smaller than the Zeeman splitting AM, where A is the s–d exchange integral and M is the magnetic moment, the lower subband conduction electrons are scattered from the d spins without changing their spin projections. On the other hand, as E becomes greater than AM, the spin-flip process can be thermally activated. For the conduction electrons in the upper subband, both spin-flip and spin-non-flip coexist. Therefore the model uses two distinctive relaxation times rather than just one. A numerical calculation is performed to fit the relation between the magnetoresistance and the magnetic moment of the yttrium atoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: