Intracellular Ca 2+ signals underlying conducted vasoconstriction in rat mesenteric terminal arterioles were investigated using Ca 2+ imaging and micro‐ejection of isotonic KCl solution. We investigated the role of gap junctions and L‐, T‐type voltage‐dependent Ca 2+ channels (VDCCs) for conduction of Ca 2+ responses along the arteriolar wall. In 83 arterioles (ID = 25 ± 1 μm), local (0 μm) application of KCl lead to local Ca 2+ responses (from 89 nM to 316 nM) and conducted (500 μm) Ca 2+ responses (from 112 nM to 177 nM). Conducted Ca 2+ responses, only, were inhibited by gap junction uncouplers carbenoxolone and palmitoleic acid, but not by tetrodotoxin or low‐Na + PSS (n = 4–8). Bath application of the L‐type blocker nifedipine (0.1–10 μM) or the T‐type blockers mibefradil; NNC 55–0396 (both 0.1–10 μM); R(−)‐efonidipine (1–33 μM) blocked local and conducted Ca 2+ responses (n = 5). Localized block of Ca 2+ entry by micro‐pipette delivery of nifedipine or NNC 55–0396 (10 μM) had no effect on the conduction of Ca 2+ responses through the affected arteriolar segments (n = 4–5). Using immunocytochemistry and/or RT‐PCR, we detected expression of Ca V 1.2, Ca V 3.1 and Ca V 3.2 VDCCs in terminal arterioles. Our results suggest that L‐type and T‐type VDCCs both mediate Ca 2+ entry in VSMC during conducted vasoconstriction in rat mesenteric terminal arterioles. However, VDCCs are not crucially involved in the conduction mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: